In my opinion, the traffic police exam tickets to drivers in categories A and B do not hold water.
The situations in the problems are far from reality, the mass of errors in the text, and questions very often not aligned with the knowledge that should get the driver. For example, why the rider to know the height of the sides of the truck when traveling with children or claim to the pneumatic actuator of brake systems, in turn, have a car driver to remember at what age can learn to drive a motorcycle on an individual basis? But questions about the medicine may confound and candidate of medical sciences. For example how to transport the victim with a closed abdominal trauma? Even health professionals, perhaps, not immediately sort out the nature of injuries at the scene, so what could demand from a young man of 18 years. i, I. Ivanov Sverdlovsk
Accountability for violations of traffic rules, as is known, aims to not only pay tribute for their actions, but also work to prevent accidents on the road to strengthen discipline. But look, the attitude in the workforce by trucking companies to the facts of the retreat of their drivers from the Regulations. Most often, they expressed sympathy with anyone, they say, does not happen. Even with the influence of alcohol more than half of the traffic police are sent to a good performance and a request not to deprive the offender the right to drive vehicles. Where is the climate of intolerance against violators of the order, the conviction of misconduct?
The reason I see it in the same administrative sanctions beat afford a driver and do not affect the very economic interests of enterprises and agencies that own vehicles.
I propose to revise the legislation and legal acts that establish the responsibility of vehicle owners, in particular, reflect the following
A. Drivers of vehicles of enterprises, collective farms, cooperatives, etc., in violation of traffic rules to the administrative responsibility is not involved. She is the owner of the vehicle, though the amount of penalty is much higher than for an individual driver.
Two. The company has the right (but not the obligation) to repay damages to recover the amount from drivers whose size does not exceed the fine for drivers of private vehicles.
I would also like to say about the management of transport in an intoxicated state. The company, paying, for example 2,000 rubles fine, very capable of deciding whether the offender to continue to work as a driver and how to avoid this in the future. A denial of rights, I think, in such cases unnecessarily lost skills, qualifications, additional funds are spent on training new staff.